While I work on my first video on my channel, I decided to read a specific Quora published article by a self proclaimed ex Muslim named Mike Muluk, here we shall go off the usual professional attitude as I did when I responded to Reddit trolls (which I shall do again and respond to more articles attacking me) today we will tackle a usual claim made by ex Muslims that I already discussed before and debunked many times, but this is only for fun and education
this is his article:
Red Text is Mike claims
I knew that darned meme would crop up. Well, if it takes a meme from 2015 to prove that Mohammad was a peaceful fella, you know something is fishy.
Yes, Memes, the best invention in history, the one thing that simple minds like Mike can only understand, yes, why resort to critical and detailed explanations, why not use memes?
The justification for killing women & children:
"The Prophet passed by me at a place called Al-Abwa or Waddan and was asked whether it was permissible to attack the pagan warriors at night with the probability of exposing their women and children to danger. The Prophet replied, "They (i.e. women and children) are from them (i.e. pagans)."
Sahih Bukhari 4:52:256
It is narrated by Sa'b b. Jaththama that he said (to the Holy Prophet)" Messenger of Allah, we kill the children of the polytheists during the night raids". He said: "They are from them".
Sahih Muslim 19:4322
The same repeated Nonsense that I already refuted over and over, children and women are only killed when they engage in battle against the Muslims so I’m going to quote myself here
“According to the following explanation by Imam Nawawi
“The Ulama Agreed on the execution of the Hadith, and prohibiting the Murder of Women and Children If they didn’t Engage in Battles, But if they do Engage and attempt to kill Muslims then only in this case they should be killed”[1]
This above explanation is direct reference to the same hadith above, under the hadith this commentary is by imam nawawi explaining what majority of scholars agree upon
Meaning women and children are not to be killed except if they are engaging in battles
Killing the whole male population after they surrendered is also being praised as “great judgment” by Muhammad:
For example, after the death of Banu Qurayza, Muhammad gave over the decision of what is to be done with the captives to a lieutenant, Sa’ad, who lost a kin in the battle:
Then the Prophet said, "O Sa’ad! These people have agreed to accept your verdict." Sa’ad said, "I judge that their warriors should be killed and their children and women should be taken as captives." The Prophet said, "You have given a judgment similar to Allah's Judgment (or the King's judgment).
"Sahih al-Bukhari, 5:58:148
Already here we have a sign of stupidity if you read the above title “Why did Prophet Muhammad, while fighting polytheist enemies, also kill their family and other people who did not attack him?”
This whole “article” by Mike is directed toward the prophet, yet this ex-Muslim Dimwit with that low IQ didn’t realize how his own quote above just shows how insane he is
“O Sa’ad! These people have agreed to accept your verdict." Sa’ad said, "I judge that their warriors should be killed and their children and women should be taken as captives."
How dumb do you have to be to not read carfully what your own source says, I read a lot of citations in my life from insane and dumb anti-muslim indivuals, but I have never seen somone destroys his own credibility with such citations, your own quote Mr.Mike destroy you, as stated this was not the judgment of Muhammad as he says ““great judgement” by Muhammad:” this was the judgment of Sa’ad who judged them based on their own holy scripture, not only that he didn’t kill non combatants, only those who have the capacity (and Did) carry swords and fought muslims are to be killed, non combatants and civilianse were left to live, I mean I can’t fathim the amount of mental gymnasitics he went through to cite a source that completely says the opposite of what he says, let alone not a single sentence here in this source says “whole male population” is to be killed, only warriors are
Even one woman (who apparently was becoming crazy witnessing the slaughter) was killed:
Narrated by Aisha: No woman of Banu Qurayza was killed except one. She was with me, talking and laughing on her back and belly (extremely), while the Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) was killing her people with the swords. Suddenly a man called her name: Where is so-and-so? She said: I I asked: What is the matter with you? She said: I did a new act. She said: The man took her and beheaded her. She said: I will not forget that she was laughing extremely although she knew that she would be killed.
Sunan Abu Dawud 14:2665
Oh let us read, did Muhammad actually killed her?......nope, it’s actually one of Muhammad soldiers who was terrified of her insanity so he beheaded her, where does it say Muhammad by his hand executed her? Honestly how many times do you Mr.Mike have to fail?
CONCLUSIONS:
It is easy to see, that Muhammad thought of the civilian population of the enemy as complicit in the enemy’s warfaring activities. That is the reason why women and children were always taken as slaves, the property was always seized and on some occasions, the whole male population was mercilessly butchered to the man.
This attitude can also be found in the doctrine of modern terrorist organizations such Al-Qaeda and ISIS, who have studied most and foremost Muhammad’s armed Jihad.
Wait? Hold on, that’s it? That’s all you got for us? That’s your conclusion? Ok let us Recap
Mike first cited two hadiths that he misunderstood and never cared to give us explanations from scholars
Then he proceeded to say Muhammad judged people of Banu Qurayza, the traitorous criminal tribe, yet his own source clearly states it was not Muhammad judgment, then he goes on and accuse Muhammad of killing a crazy woman when at no point does the hadith imply that
Then he makes this idiotic conclusion?
Here is the “Official” statement by ISIS regarding today’s attacks in Brussels and why they were “justified” was also sent out by Amaq News after the Brussels Airport Attack:
Paris Attack (13th Nov. 2015) and Brussels Attack (22nd March 2016) in the light of the Islamic Shari’ah.
Justifying the Paris attacks/Brussels attack(& the likes of it) in the light of the Qur’ān and Sunnah and the ijmā’ & quotes from the scholars of the salaf.
We have seen so many people in the social media claiming that The Islamic state was not justified in killing the French “innocent” citizens in the blessed ghazwa in Paris, and that of the Brussels attack now.We have also seen some evil “scholars” – Scholars for the dollars quoting the textual evidence out of context. Today, we shall tackle this topic with evidence from the Qur’ān and Sunnah and the ijmā’ & quotes from the scholars of the salaf
First, we want to make it clear to all that what makes the kafir’s blood permissible to spill is not him fighting the Muslims, rather it is his “KUFR” that necessitates his killing. So if one asks, can you kill a Kafir (who does not fight Islam and Muslims)? the answer is a big YES.
[■] Explaining the “Mafhūm Al-Mukhālafah” (the understanding of the opposite) in Usūl Fiqh:
This is like when Allāh said: “And never pray (funeral prayer) upon any of them (i.e. the hypocrites) who dies, nor stand at his grave.” (At-Tawbah verse 84). So because the disbelieving hypocrites were those whom Allāh specifically identified as being prohibited to have the funeral prayer performed upon and their graves visited, then this necessitates that the Muslims are those who are to be prayed upon and whose graves are to be visited. And this is understood by the rule: “Mafhūm Al-Mukhālafah” (the understanding of the opposite), because if we say the disbelievers are those whom Allāh specified a prohibition regarding something, then this necessities that the opposite ruling would apply for those who are opposite to them (i.e. the believers). So this is the explanation for the rule: “Mafhūm Al-Mukhālafah”, which is also referred to as: “Dalīl Al-Khitāb”. ○●○●○●○
The example of the prohibition of praying the funeral prayer for the disbeliever indicating the permissibility of praying the funeral prayer for the Muslims and visiting their graves was used by Shaykh Al-Islām Ibn Taymiyyah frequently, as he said: “And do not ever pray upon anyone of them who dies and do not stand at their graves.” Therefore, the ‘Dalīl Al-Khitāb’ is that the believers are prayed upon and their graves are to be stood at.” [“Majmū’ Al-Fatāwa ”, Vol. 3/399; also look to Vol. 24/330 & Vol. 24/346 & Vol. 27/448]
Allah says: “…But if they repent and perform As-Salat, and give Zakat, then leave their way free…” (At-Tawbah Verse 5)
NOTE: Repentance in the above ayah means saying the shahadatain and entering Islam. Ibn ‘Umar narrates that the Rasulullah(saw) said: “I have been ordered to fight against the people until they testify that there is none worthy of worship except Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and until they establish the Salah and pay the Zakah. And if they do so then they will have gained protection from me for their lives and property, unless [they commit acts that are punishable] in accordance to Islam, and their reckoning will be with Allah the Almighty.” [Sahih Bukhari & Sahih Muslim] Therefore, the ‘Dalīl Al-Khitāb’ in the above ayah & hadeeth is that, if the kuffar don’t become Muslims, their blood would not be protected and would be legal to spill and their wealth would be halal to take.
Allah also has made the blood of every kafir legal to spill in the general ayah: “So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush” (At-Tawbah verse 5).
Allah just said the mushrikeen(idolators), so he never differentiated the “innocent civilians” from the “fighting soldiers”. So who are we to differentiate the kuffar today?
Ijmā’ of the ulamaa on the legality of spilling the blood of the Kuffar:
● Ibn Kathir said: “Ibn Jareer narrated an Ījmā'(scholarly consensus) that it is permissiable to kill a kafir if he has no protection even if he is in Baytul Harām or Baytul Maqdis” [Tafsīr Ibn Katheer 2/6]
● Al Qurtubi said: “The ulamaa have gathered in consensus(ijmā’) that; if a kafir was to wrap his neck with his hands and the backs of all the trees in the Haram(Makkah) (in an effort to save his life); that would not prevent his killing if he had no previous contract of security” [Tafsīr At-Tabari 6/61] ♢♢♢♢♢
Quotes of the ulamā’ of the salaf about the legality of apilling the blood of the kuffar even if they dont fight us:
● Imam Ash-Shafi’ said: “Allah the exalted & blessed legalized(to spill) the blood and wealth of the kafir unless he pays the jizya(tax) or he is granted protection for a certain period” [Al Umm 1/264]
● Imam Ash-Shawkāni said: “As for the Kufar, their blood is basicaly legal(to spill) as it is in the ayah of the sword(At-Tawbah verse 5), what about if they start fighting(us)?” [Al Sayrul Jarār ..
● Umar bin Al Khattab said to Abu Jandal (May Allah be pleased with them both): “For verily they are Mushrikeen(polytheits), and the blood of one of them is like the blood of a dog” [Reported by Ahmad & Al Bayhaqi]
● Ibn Muflih said: “There is no expiation nor blood money paid for killing a kafir that has no peace treaty, because his blood is generaly permissiable(to spill) like the pig” [Al Mubdi’ 8/263]
● Ash-Shawkāni said: “The kafir, whether he fights(the Muslims) or not: his blood is permissiable(to spill) as long as he is a kafir” [Al Sayrul Jarār 4/369]
● Al Kāsāni: “Basicaly: Anyone(who is a kafir) from the fighters(i.e. the male that has reached the fighting age): it is permissiable to kill him whether he fights(the Muslims) or not” [Badā’ As-Sanāi’ 7/101]
● Al Qurtubi said: “If a Muslim meets a kafir that has no contract(of protection): it is permissiable for him to kill that Kafir” [Tafsīr Al-Qurtubi 5/338]
● As-Sarkhāsi said: “There is no sin upon one who kills the appostates before calling them to Islam because they are the same with the kuffar and the Message(of Islam) has reached them” [Al Mabsūt 10/120]
●Imam An-Nawawi said: “As for the kafir that has no contract of peace(with a legitimate Islamic State to which he pays Jizya), there is no liability in killing him, from whatever religion he might be” [Rawdhatu Tālibīn 9/259]
●Ibn Hajar Al ‘Asqalāni said: “The existence of the disbelief (Kufr) is what permits the blood” [“Fat’h Al-Bārī ”, Vol. 12/326; publication of “Maktabat Dār As-Salām” & “Maktabat Dār Al-Fayhā’ ”, 1st Edition, 1418 H.]
♢♢♢♢♢♢♢♢♢♢♢♢♢♢♢♢♢♢♢♢♢
For those that say that we mistranslate these Quranic verses of Jihad and Qitaal and we go against the ‘known’ ‘ulamaa’:
then give them this audio by Shaykh Ibn ‘Utheymīn who they respect alot who says exactly what we have said now
Shaykh Ibn ‘Utheymin(rh), said in a tape recording regarding this topic: “And the second (matter) is the forbiddance of killing women and children in times of war. But if it is said: ‘If they (the kuffār) do this to us – meaning that they kill our children and women – Then do we then kill them?’ The apparent [dhāhir] is that it is (permissible) for us to kill their women and children- And due to the generality of the Statement of Allāh: “Then whoever transgresses the prohibition against you, you transgress likewise against him”{ Al-Baqarah: 194} [Refer to the side “B” from the third cassette of Kitāb al-Jihād from Sharh Bulūgh al-Marām. Starting at time frame 29:09]
In addition to the above cattegories of those of the kuffar that we shouldnt kill, we have :
1. The Children
2. The Women
3. The Old etc.
》》 So All those kuffar cattegories we mentioned that their blood is protected; they can be killed anytime should they violate their contracts by:
A.) If the dhimi/Mu’āhad starts fighting the Muslims etc he is killed and his blood would be legal to spill despite him paying jizya
B.) If the kuffar kill our children/Women/old we do the same: Allah Says: “So whoever has transgressed against you, then transgress against him in the same way that he has transgressed against you” [Al Baqarah 194]
So how many Muslim women and children and old have The French Kuffar killed in Syria, Iraq and other parts of the muslim lands???? We have not yet settled the scores, a few hundreds aint enough yet.
Allah also says: “And if you punish [an enemy, O believers], punish with an equivalent of that with which you were harmed” [An-Nahl 126]
Allah Also Says: “And the retribution for an evil act is an evil one like it” [Ash-Shūrah 40]
Allah also says: “And those who, when an oppressive wrong is done to them, they take revenge” [Ash-Shūrah verse 39].
So, this was a piece of article for the one who cry and mourn on the death of the Kuffar, while the death hundreds of muslim men, women, old and children dying daily in the airstrikes don’t effect them in anyway.
MAY ALLAH ACCEPT THE EFFORTS MADE TO COLLECT THESE PROOFS N EVIDENCES N MAY HE UNITE THIS UMMAH UNDER ONE LEADER AND ONE BANNER, M MAY ALLAH GRANT IZZAH TO ISLAM N MUSLIMS EVERY WHERE ON THE EARTH N MAY HE GRANT VICTORY TO THIS RELIGION ESTABLISHING THE SHARI’AH OF ALLAH IN EVERY CORNER OF THE EARTH.
AAMEEEN.
Offical? Really? so what is the source? I checked all sources including ex-Muslims Reddit, and it all point toward
apparently, the article is not accessible at all, so how can you I used the way back machine to dig back the deleted article
the article has been saved over 42 times which I opened all of them
I was able to find the official story here in English
https://web.archive.org/web/20170225033305/http://heavy.com/news/2016/03/official-isis-announcement-state-on-belgium-attacks-bombings-attack-brussels-paris-attacks-france-amaq-news-agency-terrorism-bombs-tweet-twitter-english-translation/
https://web.archive.org/web/20170225033305/http://heavy.com/news/2016/03/official-isis-announcement-state-on-belgium-attacks-bombings-attack-brussels-paris-attacks-france-amaq-news-agency-terrorism-bombs-tweet-twitter-english-translation/
Big problem is that Heavy gives no direct link to the quote when they said that a longer version can be found, there is littraly not a single cite out there that give reffrence to this fake translation that Heavy provided, so I was left with no option other than to find the original Arabic text, the best option we have is the A’maq news agency the official ISIS news outlet that was the first to proclaim the attack, unfortunantly for our research A’maq was taken down by a group of muslim Hackers (see how muslims fight ISIS and ex-muslims complain like cowards?)yet I was left with no lead to the website since it was taken down dabiq was then left and was not accesable since it was blocked, the only magazine I was able to access with the publication “why we hate you and why we fight you” other than that both website and magazine are blocks
So we are left with a claim made by Heavy news outlet where they point out the source yet the source doesn’t exist, I looked over all Arabic sources that contain quotations to Brussels attack statements from ISIS, neither any of them had a reference to that big quote ISIS made, so far we have a questionable source with questionable link that was deleted by the source itself
Why does anyone take this seriously?
