Salaam Alaikum.
I'm currently active on youtube and this is an update on what is happening with the blog, I have received a request from TMA to make 5 best arguments I had from random topics, I will postpone it after my reply to sharif gabir new video on Quran, but first I had to update my article on discovering the truth websites requested by DTT author, after that as requested I will refute the atrocities committed by Sharif on his no video on Quran, after that I will do the request TMA asked.
in the meantime, this post will serve as an update but will be deleted when the first work is up.
Jazakum Allah Khair.
Zaid, How old are you by way?
ReplyDelete27
DeleteYou're old 😄
DeleteI was joking Zaid 😉 hope you're not upset haha 😄
DeleteYou're infact very young especially for the difficult stuff you're doing right now...May Allah give you strength 👍
"5 best arguments" for what?
ReplyDeleteYou mean arguments to prove islam?
No, 5 best arguments i made against his videos in my articles, like pointing out his usaged of fabricated sources, and misquotation.
DeleteSo the masked arab himself has has contacted yo to provide your 5 best refutations of his arguments? Why so? Will he make a response to your refutations?
DeleteProbably, although I fear the size of his audience and what that will do to my blog.
Deleteit's very normal
DeleteAssalamu alaikum
ReplyDeleteQuick question about a hadith which some use to smear the prophet and claim he has bad morals are these 2 and i was wondering if you could help me with these inshaAllah
The first one is with regards to the hadith which says the prophet saws he would suckle on the tongue of hassan and hussein and when just hearinf this it sounds odd and weird
The sources for this are
Musnad Ahmed Hadith Number 16245, Volume Title: "The Sayings of the Syrians," Chapter Title: "Hadith of Mu’awiya Ibn Abu Sufyan": "I saw the prophet – pbuh – sucking on the tongue or the lips of Al-Hassan son of Ali, may the prayers of Allah be upon him. For no tongue or lips that the prophet sucked on will be tormented (by hell fire)
Adab al mufrad bukhari 1183: Then the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, opened his mouth and put his tongue in his mouth
I also heard of hadith saying that muhammad saws would suxk the tongue of his daughter fatima and that he would not sleep until he put his head in between her breasts.
Are these three things sahih and if they are how can this be. I have seen some answers saying that this is because muhammad saws wanted to remove their thirst however this cant be with the hadith os musnad ahmad as it says he himself suxked the tongue of hassan meaning that the prophet is sucking the tongue so hassan isnt getting saliva to get their thirst quenched
The second thing which i do believe is weak however i wanted a confirmation as i know some hadith say this and some anti islamic people do as well. It is about the hadith where it says he kissed the male member of hussein for example
Another Hadith. Majma al-Zawa’id, Ali ibn Abu Bakr al-Haythami, 299/9 مجمع الزوائد لعلي بن أبى بكر الهيثمي
رأيت رسول الله صلى الله عليه و سلم فرج ما بين فخذي الحسين و قبل زبيبته
رواه الطبراني و إسناده حسن
translated into English: “I saw the Messenger of Allah pbuh putting Husein’s legs apart and kissing his (little) penis.”
I think these are weak and fabricated however can you give me prove inshaallah
Ans the final thing was again weird ( i know i jist wanted to ask these because peopls bring these up to defame the prophet.
The final one is with regards to some people who actually drank the urine of our prophet
Imam Jalal al-Din Suyuti reports from Tabarani and Bayhaqi who narrate from Hukaymah bint Umaymah (May Allah be pleased with her) with an authentic chain of transmission, she said, 'the Prophet (May Allah shower peace and blessings on Him) had a wooden bowl in which He used to urinate and was placed under His bed. One night, He searched for it but did not find it and asked for it saying, ‘where is the bowl?’ The members of the house replied ‘Umm Salamah’s slave girl Barrah drank from it’ who came from Habashah with her. The Prophet replied, ‘surely she has protected herself from the fire with a great wall’’'.[3]
Imam Jalal al-Din Suyuti reports from Abu Ya’la, Hakim, Dar Qutni, Tabarani and Abu Nu’aym from Umm Ayman May Allah be pleased with her, who said, ‘the Prophet got up one night and urinated in a bowl. During that night, I rose in the state of thirst so I drank whatever was in the bowl. In the morning I told Him what I had done to which He smiled and said, ‘surely you will never have pain in your stomach’’. Abu Ya’ala’s wordings are as follows, ‘you will never feel stomach pain as of today’.
And there are even more ahadith but just these for now
Regarding these hadith
1. Why would they even drink his urine
2. Why would he saws approve of it
3. Are these ahadiths sahih as i have seen some big scholars like al albani, dhahabi, suyuti etc. Authenticate it.
Please help me with these questions and doubts inshaAllah that people use to try to defsme the character snd morals of the prophet
" the prophet saws he would suckle on the tongue of hassan and hussein and when just hearinf this it sounds odd and weird
DeleteThe sources for this are
Musnad Ahmed Hadith Number 16245, Volume Title: "The Sayings of the Syrians," Chapter Title: "Hadith of Mu’awiya Ibn Abu Sufyan": "I saw the prophet – pbuh – sucking on the tongue or the lips of Al-Hassan son of Ali, may the prayers of Allah be upon him. For no tongue or lips that the prophet sucked on will be tormented (by hell fire)
"
this as far as i'm concern the only authentic hadith among all the ones you mentioned
the rest regarding the penis and the urine are not authentic by any means
regarding the so called penis one one of the narrator is قابوس بن أبي ظبيان َqabus bin abi thibian, and he is regareded as weak
source:
tabaqat al kubra by ibn aby sa'ad
now going back to the original hadith regarding the suckling, often there are mistranslations of the words brought by arabic scriptite, note i'm not saying at any chance that suckling is falsly mistraslated, no, the translation is littraly authentic from arabic to english, however what i'm trying to point out is that the word suckling here doesn't nessistate the action of putting lips of tongue as you might think, there is a word in classical arabic that discribe what you think and what Wikiislam (the sourecs you got it from) think, and that is رضاب Rithab simply means a sucked sliva of the mouth, so if you want to convay a proper wording the arabic sentence must contain the word رضاب to convay what wikiislam is saying, and what you think it's saying, however, the word is not found anywhere
source for the word
Lisan al arab the most authentic arabic to arabic dictionary gives the following example
"الرُّضابُ : ما يَرْضُبُه الإِنسانُ من رِيقِه كأَنه يَمْتَصُّه ، وإِذا قَبَّل جاريَتَه رَضَبَ رِيقَها . "
Translation:
Rithab: what a man will suck as he is sucking on someone mouth as if he kisses his girl he sucks from her mouth
https://www.almaany.com/ar/dict/ar-ar/%D8%B1%D8%B6%D8%A7%D8%A8/?c=%D9%84%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%86%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A8
as you can see, that word above convey that meaning that Wikiislam is aiming for, but it's not found anywhere in any arabic text that mentions wha the prophet done to hassan son of Ali, therefore he was not doing that practice at all, the closest thing that you could convey from it is that Muhammad was simply kissing Hassan not doing what you think he did
so next time someone tell you muhammad committed acts of homosexuality with hassan tell them that they lack brain cells on understanding how arabic works
all the others apparently you know how weak they are, but the one regarding kissing penis is probably the weakest one, among others regarding urine, wikiislam says it's authentic but cites no evidence for such claim.
Hi,I want to hear your thoughts on mutah marriage. It is temporary marriage with a woman for sexual intercourse,with a dowry,after intercourse it is over. Muhammad himself allowed his men to practice that in wars,seen in a couple of hadiths. I dont see any diffirence between that and what we call prostution today? Give the woman money,have sex then leave, how was that moral and acceptable once? (Though not now) I wonder what your defense will be
ReplyDeleteBook 008, Number 3252:
Sabra Juhanni reported: Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) permitted temporary marriage for us. So I and another person went out and saw a woman of Bana 'Amir, who was like a young long-necked she-camel. We presented ourselves to her (for contracting temporary marriage), whereupon she said: What dower would you give me? I said: My cloak. And my companion also said: My cloak. And the cloak of-my companion was superior to my cloak, but I was younger than he. So when she looked at the cloak of my companion she liked it, and when she cast a glance at me I looked more attractive to her. She then said: Well, you and your cloak are sufficient for me. I remained with her for three nights, and then Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) said: He who has any such woman with whom he had contracted temporary marriage, he should let her off.
http://www.islamawareness.net/Marriage/Mutah/hadith_muslim.html
i think i have already addressed that in a comment dialog with an atheist
Deletehttp://azblogtalk.blogspot.com/2017/12/why-masked-arab-is-masked-falsehood.html
and Quran does actually respond to prostitution
Deletehttp://quran.com/24/33
that thread is about slavery and sex with slaves,Im mentioning something else here. Mutah Marriage, as seen in that hadith above, the guys pay the woman, to have sex with her via a temporary marriage. Im asking you how that is any diffirent from today's concept of "prostitution?" How is that any diffirent and how would a perfectly moral prophet of god permit such an immorality?
DeleteIrrelevant,you are talking about slavery Im talking about mutah marriage,pls read my message again
Deleteyou completely missed the point, that thread was all about consent, from the article itself to the comment section and i lay down evidence from the prophet against rape and turning anti muslim commentators sources against them, you mentioned mut'ah in the context of consent so i gave you that thread, slavery just happened to be mentioned
Deleteand i have already given you a verse that talks about prostitution, Muta is no way related to prostitution at all.
DeleteYou are the one missing the point,I didnt say consent. Its irrelevant here. That verse forbids forcing slaves to prostitution but i dont talk about prostitution of slaves here,im just talking about mutah. clearly seen in that mutah hadith above, what they do is exactly prostitution. Answer this: in mutah you pay woman ,have sex then leave. In prostitution its the same. Both consensual. So how is mutah any diffirent than that? The event described in this hadith is what we call prostitution today. Show me the diffirence?
DeleteRead
Deletehttps://pastebin.com/Eu42Vv4B
you do know mutah is haram right
DeleteThe Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) said:
“O people, I had permitted you Mutah before, [but now] whoever of you has any part in it currently must part with her, and do not take back anything which you may have given them, as Allah Exalted and Majestic has forbidden it until the day of resurrection.” [Muslim, Abu Dawood, Ibn Majah, Nasa`i, and Darimi]
Ali (رضّى الله عنه) said:
“The Messenger of Allah had forbidden Mutah on the day of Khaybar and had forbidden the eating of the meat of domestic camels.” [Bukhari, Muslim, Tirmizy, Ibn Majah, Nasa`i, Tahawy, Shafi’i, Bayhaqy, and Hazimy]
Ali (رضّى الله عنه) said to a man who was engaging in Mutah:
“You are a straying person, the Messenger of Allah has forbidden temporary marriage and the meat of domestic camels on the day of Khaybar.” [Muslim and Bayhaqy]
A man called Rabee’ Bin Sabra said to Umar bin Abdul Aziz:
“I testify that according to my father that it happened that the Messenger of Allah had forbidden it [Mutah] on the farewell pilgrimage.” [Abu Dawood and Imam Ahmad]
According to Abu Huraira:
The Messenger of Allah had forbidden or abolished temporary marriage, its marriage and its divorce, its waiting period, and its inheritance. [DarQutny, Ishaq Bin Rahwiya, and Ibn Habban]
When Ali (رضّى الله عنه) was given the Caliphate, he thanked Allah Most High and praised Him and said:
“O people, the Messenger of Allah had permitted Mutah three times then forbade it. I swear by Allah, ready to fulfil my oath, that if I find any person who engages in temporary marriage without having ratified this with a proper marriage, I will have him lashed 100 stripes unless he can bring two witnesses to prove that the Messenger had permitted it after forbidding it.” [Ibn Majah]
Imam Muslim has narrated that according to Mohammad Bin Abdullah Bin Numayr who said:
“My father had narrated to us according to Ubaidullah according to Ibn shahab according to Alhassan and Abdullah the sons of Mohammad bin Ali according to their father according to Ali that he heard Ibn Abbas being lenient towards temporary marriage, so he said, ‘wait Ibn Abbas, the Messenger of Allah had forbidden it on the day of Khaybar when he also prohibited the meat of domestic camels.’” [Sahih Muslim]
Narrated Salama bin Al-Akwa:
“In the year of Autas, Allah’s Messenger permitted a temporary marriage for three nights, but he prohibited it afterwards.” [Sahih Muslim]
Narrated Ali (رضّى الله عنه):
“Allah’s Messenger forbade the temporary marriage in the year of Khaybar.” [Sahih Muslim and Sahih Bukhari]
Narrated Ali (رضّى الله عنه):
“At the battle of Khaybar, the Prophet forbade the temporary marriage (i.e Mutah) of women, and the eating of the flesh of domestic asses.” [Sahih Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, Ahmad, An-Nasa’i, At-Termidhi and Ibn Majah have all collected it]
It was narrated from Ali (رضّى الله عنه) that:
The Messenger of Allah forbade Mutah marriage and the meat of domestic donkeys at the time of Khaybar. According to another report, he forbade Mutah marriage at the time of Khaybar and he forbade the meat of tame donkeys. [Narrated by Bukhari, 3979; Muslim, 1407.]
It was narrated from al-Rabee’ ibn Sabrah al-Juhanithat his father told him that he was with the Messenger of Allah who said:
“O people, I used to allow you to engage in Mutah marriages, but now Allah has forbidden that until the Day of Resurrection, so whoever has any wives in a Mutah marriage, he should let her go and do not take anything of the (money) you have given them.” [Narrated by Muslim, 1406.]
Sabrah bin Ma’ bad al-Jihani reported:
“I went forth with the Prophet for the conquest of Mecca, and he allowed us Mutah with women. But we had not even left the city [yet] when it was prohibited by the Messenger of Allah.”
as for the reason why it was haram in the first place is because people before islam would pratice it on a massive massive scal so muhammad saws cant just come and stop it all because people would go crazy. compare it with the use of alcohol before islam the people used to drink a lot so it was stopped in stages
DeleteLikewise, Mutah was a hobby of the pagan Arabs. Hence, it was not forbidden in the beginning. This is because Islam was in a transitional stage. The Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) initially allowed Mutah on a few occassions because there were many new converts to Islam who had weak faith. They were often in times of war away from their wives, in which their desires got the best of them since they were not accustomed to the chastity of Islam. In order to prevent the apostacy of these new converts over the issue of Mutah, the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) did not forbid Mutah immediately.
Hani
DeleteI never said mutah is not harm please don't strawman me
I said it was allowed at one time then disallowed later on
assalamu alaikum
ReplyDeleteinshallah you could help me with some doybts i have been having regarding 2 articles and videos. i have been having some questions over them and if you could help me answer them that would be great.
the articles: https://quranspotlight.wordpress.com/articles/dhul-qarnayn-sunset-sunrise/
https://embryologyinthequran.blogspot.nl/2012/09/embryology-in-quran-much-ado-about.html
and the videos: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Doxb4TSqvew
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FaNg_nxqns
and sme ahadith which are:
sahih muslim : When forty-two nights pass after the semen gets into the womb, Allah sends the angel and gives him shape. Then he creates his sense of hearing, sense of sight, his skin, his flesh, his bones, and then says: My Lord, would he be male or female?
and with regards to the above ahadith there are many mmore hadith speaking of taking 40 days as being semen and then 40 days as flesh, for example this hadith:
The creation of everyone of you starts with the process of collecting the material for his body within forty days and forty nights in the womb of his mother. Then he becomes a clot of thick blood for a similar period (40 days) .... bukhari 7454
i have multiple questions regarding them. firstly we know you dont stay as a sperm for 40 days but rather you are already a piece of flesh by then. just look at an embryo of 22-28 days for example.
next question it says that only after 42 days allah chooses if it is a male or female but we know that there is already a chromosome in the sperm itself, so it doesnt take 42 days to determin a babys gende, rather it is instant as the sperm already contains the x or the y chromosome.
next hadith
The Prophet (ﷺ) replied, “As for the child, if the man’s discharge proceeds the woman’s discharge, the child attracts the similarity to the man, and if the woman’s discharge proceeds the man’s, then the child attracts the similarity to the woman.” bukhari
we know this isnt how it works with regards to babys looks and the speed of discharge so how do we reconcile
please help inshaAllah
jazakallahkhair
addressed
Deletehttps://pastebin.com/TNWZhLZ9
Your islampaper link is not the refutation of that embrylogyinthequran link. It includes articles not related to embrylogyinthequranblogspot, they are independent articles,not refutations.
Delete"It includes articles not related to embrylogyinthequranblogspot"
Deleteare you referring to islam papers? the link you gave is a dedicated rebuttal to Hamza article in embryology that refute the claim that the quran plagiarize ancient Greek embryology, the problem here is that the link you gave attempt to associate Greek embryology with quran in which islam papers dedicated several articles regarding this
you can start seeing the author rebuttal at page 101 onwards where he attempted to associate muhammad with Greek embryology, islam papers responded to that
About greek plagiarize claim yes it has papers.but the rest of the
Deletethe article, word by word analysis and refutatiton of hamza's miracle claims are not addressed
then you are basically ask me to comment on the personal query between Hamza and this author captain disguise, as i just went through his paper after page 101 there are several inconsistencies i noticed
Deletefor example on page 116 he tries and fails at associating the 40 days hadith with ancient Jewish Talmud that says after 40 days the semen is merely flowed, he tries to associate that with the hadith and claimed Muhammad borrowed it, this is a strawman, the hadith says that man is not merely fashioned only from semen, meaning another critical part plays in process, which is correct, semen is consistent of only 96% water 4% chromosome, Captain disguise however says this is scientifically false and cites no evidence for that, interestingly the Jewish scripture he cites doesn't say anything remotely identical to the hadith, it states and i quote "teaches that man is not fashioned from all the drop but only from its purest part"
note how he didn't highlight "only from it's purest part" because it refute his claims, this Jewish scripture claim that only one part of the semen is responsible for the formation of human, but hadith state that there is another part responsible for it, the hadith corrects the Jewish scripture, there are other examples of inconsistency and dishonesty from captain disguise
for example on page 116
"
103
(b)
Parallels to ideas in the Hadith
It is rather interesting that many of the ideas found in the Hadith are alsofound expressed verbatim in older texts; especially that of the Jewish Talmud. Thefollowing are a list of the ideas in the Hadith and its parallels found in texts older thanthe Qur'an.
b.1)
Semen stage lasts 40 days
Sahih Muslim Book 33, Hadith 6395I listened with these two ears of mine Allahs Messenger (may peace be upon him) assaying:
The semen stays in the womb for forty nights
, then the angel, gives it ashape.
201
The same idea is expressed in the Jewish Talmud in Tractate Yebamoth 69b;
202
b.2)
Gender determined after 40 days"
he cites hadith
"Sahih Muslim, Book 33, number 6392The drop of semen remains in the womb for
forty or fifty (days) or forty nights
, theangel comes and says: My Lord, will he be good or evil? And both these things would be written. Then the angel says: My Lord,
would he be male or female?"
and attempt to associate it with Tractate Berakoth 60a from the Jewish Talmud
"Within the first three days a man should pray that the seed should not putrefy; from the third to the fortieth day he should pray that the child should be a male"
notice the difference between the Jewish Talmud and the hadith, the Jewish scripture merely state that a man should pray after 40 days no where does it state that gender is decided, merely state a man should pray from the third to the fortieth day
no where again does it state gender is decided
these are few errors of first glimpses, if i dedicate time to his "rebuttal" god knows how many atrocities i will find
"but the rest of the
the article, word by word analysis and refutatiton of hamza's miracle claims are not addressed"
so you are basically asking me to defend hamza for himself? first hamza does not claim scientific miracles not any more like me
second the first half of paper is dependent on the second half after page 101 where he attempt to prove his hypothesis that Muhammad plagiarized from other scriptures, if the second half is refuted the rest of the first half fall apart
i didnt mean to strawman you my commen was more so directed to the anonymous guy/sceptical77 who said mutah s bad and islam permits it thus ik showed it is haram
ReplyDeletesalam
ReplyDeletei had some questions regarding some verses some people use to accuse the problem of absurdities and mistakes, and inshaallah you could help me with your knowledge.
the first one was with regards to this verse:
quran 21:17: لَوْ أَرَدْنَا أَن نَّتَّخِذَ لَهْوًا لَّاتَّخَذْنَاهُ مِن لَّدُنَّا إِن كُنَّا فَاعِلِينَ
trans: Had We intended to take a diversion, We could have taken it from [what is] with Us - if [indeed] We were to do so.
i have a question regarding this verse as when looking at the tafasir regarding it, it looks quite bad/absurd.
what i mean by this is :
jalalayn: Had We desired to find some diversion that which provides diversion in the way of a partner or a child We would have found it with Ourselves from among the beautiful-eyed houris or angels were We to do so. But We did not do so thus We never desired it.
this tafsir makes it seem that the verse is meaning to say that if allah wanted to take a wife he would take it from the houris. How could this be a descrpttion of allah swt, to say he would take a wife for pleasure
i also went to ibn kathir in arabic ( i dont know arabic but i google translated it)
it says: waqal alhasan , waqitadat , waghirhuma : ( law 'aradna 'an natakhidh lahwanaan ) allahw : almar'at bilisan 'ahl alyaman .
this means that hasan qtada and more have said that the lawh or pastime in this verse refers to women for pleasure for women, my question is the same and how could allah swt be an entity that can take women from yemen from his pleasure
the tafsir also says: waqal 'iibrahim alnakheia : ( law 'aradna 'an natakhidh lahwanaan laatakhadhnah ) min alhawr aleayn .
this again means that the pastime in this verse are hur al ayn and my question is the same as in the tafsir of jalalayn
ibn kathirs tafsir: http://quran.ksu.edu.sa/tafseer/katheer/sura21-aya17.html#katheer
al tabaris tafsir mentions again that it could mean the women for entertainemtn and again like ibn kathir mentions it couldmean the women from yemen
his tafsir:http://quran.ksu.edu.sa/tafseer/tabary/sura21-aya17.html#tabary
al qortoby again mentions al awh/pastime in this verse refers to women. quote: law 'aradna 'an natakhidh lahwanaan - faqal : allahw alzawjat
also he again mentions yemen
his tafsir: http://quran.ksu.edu.sa/tafseer/qortobi/sura21-aya17.html#qortobi
and thats the last tafsir i menion, i think my question regarding quran 21;17 is clear inshaAllah that how could it be that allah could take wmen for pleasure and enjoyment like from the hur or from yemen. i hope that with your knowledge of arabic you culd show me the correct interpretation of this verse.
the next question is with regards to this verse:
quran 69:32, Then into a chain whose length is seventy cubits insert him."
when looking at this verse and its tafsir it seems quite weird and explicit.
ibn kathir says: Then fasten him on a chain whereof the length is seventy cubits!) Ka`b Al-Ahbar said, "Every ring of it will be equal to the entire amount of iron found in this world.'' Al-`Awfi reported that Ibn `Abbas and Ibn Jurayj both said, "Each cubit will be the forearm's length of an angel.'' Ibn Jurayj reported that Ibn `Abbas said,
but my question/doubt is with regards to this part of the tafsir: (Then fasten him) "It will be entered into his buttocks and pulled out of his mouth. Then they will be arranged on this (chain) just like locusts are arranged on a stick that is being roasted.'' Al-`Awfi reported from Ibn `Abbas that he said, "It will be ran into his behind until it is brought out of his two nostrils so he will not be able to stand on his two feet.
part 2 to my original comment as t was too long
ReplyDeletei find this to be quite weird, that allah swt would say that he would take a chain and enter it into the backside of a human being, other tafasir say quite the same thing and it sounds quite weird. i have seen some people online saying how can an all knowing all mighty being be concerned with putting irn in the anus of a human being. also it seems quite contradictory because the first part of the tafsir says that it is the length like all the iron in the world, then how would this even be able to fit.
next question inshaAllah
6:101: [He is] Originator of the heavens and the earth. How could He have a son when He does not have a companion and He created all things? And He is, of all things, Knowing.
people claim this shows that allah swt is non almighty because he needs a wife to have a son, also theyclaim this is a wrong statement as the christians have a son of gd without a wife
and my last 2 questions if i am allowed to ask
the first one: is that allah says multiple times in the qurna that he holds up the skt and if he didnt he could let the sky fall onto the erath. however how does this work, how could this happen as the sky is not physical to be able to fall on the earth.
and the next one is from quran 24:43 which says that hail comes from mountains, however we know that it cmes from clouds and not mountains
please help me with these doubts inshaallah
jazakallah khair
https://pastebin.com/Ym0AuuWi
Deleteyou will have to tell me where are you getting these allegations from.
DeleteOh so at quran 21:17 what Allah is saying is that he if he wanted to take a son he could have taken a son from the woman of paradise? Or what is the correct interpretation of the verse
ReplyDeleteNext up for the sky falling. I had a question more so to do with the sky falling on the earth, how could the sky ever fall on the earth. As this seems quite physical.
"Next up for the sky falling. I had a question more so to do with the sky falling on the earth,how could the sky ever fall on the earth. As this seems quite physical."
Deleteyou might want to ask that question to NASA since they wrote an article with the same exact title, tell them "how could you say the sky is falling when it's not physical?"
"Oh so at quran 21:17 what Allah is saying is that he if he wanted to take a son he could have taken a son from the woman of paradise? Or what is the correct interpretation of the verse"
precisely, if he wanted (and Allah SWT already says he won't) he could take a son from virgins of paradise
this has nothing to do with pleasure at all
I apologise but I was unable to read your reply to the Babylonian article because when I went to delete an earlier comment, the section refused to load, if you can't access it, then provide a brief summary of the article and young pharoah here, if you can, re paste it here, thank you.
ReplyDeleteSalam.